<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Worse than the Disease</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eyeonethics.org/2009/03/13/worse-than-the-disease/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eyeonethics.org/2009/03/13/worse-than-the-disease/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 02:41:25 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maria Monette F. Mesa</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeonethics.org/2009/03/13/worse-than-the-disease/comment-page-1/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria Monette F. Mesa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeonethics.org/?p=133#comment-535</guid>
		<description>Hi! Im Monette Mesa, law student from Ateneo de Manila University. I read the deliberations and transcript of sessions in the House of Representatives for the Right to Reply Bill. Admittedly, the bill suffers from major constitutional infirmities. I also appreciate the efforts of Rep. del Mar, Rep. Casino, Rep. Colmenares, Rep. Locsin, Rep. Zamora &amp; Rep. Palatino during the interpellation in denouncing this bill. However, I suggest that the critics of this bill be more prepared in their legal arguments. The bill is very vague and assuming that it&#039;s valid, there are problems about its implementation. I suggest that critics of this bill point out the US Fairness Doctrine which will strengthen the unconstitutionality of this pending legislation. Lastly, I agree that this is a matter which is best resolved through media&#039;s self- regulation and ethics standards. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! Im Monette Mesa, law student from Ateneo de Manila University. I read the deliberations and transcript of sessions in the House of Representatives for the Right to Reply Bill. Admittedly, the bill suffers from major constitutional infirmities. I also appreciate the efforts of Rep. del Mar, Rep. Casino, Rep. Colmenares, Rep. Locsin, Rep. Zamora &amp; Rep. Palatino during the interpellation in denouncing this bill. However, I suggest that the critics of this bill be more prepared in their legal arguments. The bill is very vague and assuming that it&#8217;s valid, there are problems about its implementation. I suggest that critics of this bill point out the US Fairness Doctrine which will strengthen the unconstitutionality of this pending legislation. Lastly, I agree that this is a matter which is best resolved through media&#8217;s self- regulation and ethics standards. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
