<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which way to sway—a dilemma for the media in Malaysia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eyeonethics.org/2008/07/29/which-way-to-sway-a-dilemma-for-the-media-in-malaysia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eyeonethics.org/2008/07/29/which-way-to-sway-a-dilemma-for-the-media-in-malaysia/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 02:41:25 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fariza</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeonethics.org/2008/07/29/which-way-to-sway-a-dilemma-for-the-media-in-malaysia/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>fariza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeonethics.org/?p=98#comment-280</guid>
		<description>Hi, I just want to know how abjective of Malaysian media. I meant media in Malaysia. Can you explain to me? Thank for your attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I just want to know how abjective of Malaysian media. I meant media in Malaysia. Can you explain to me? Thank for your attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antares</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeonethics.org/2008/07/29/which-way-to-sway-a-dilemma-for-the-media-in-malaysia/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Antares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeonethics.org/?p=98#comment-257</guid>
		<description>&quot;Objectivity&quot; doesn&#039;t really exist except as an excuse for not accepting full responsibility for one&#039;s perceptions, opinions, and beliefs.
For too many generations we have been left-brained biased - exalting rational thought above irrational feelings. But in nature, what we call&quot;irrational feelings&quot; are actually our instincts, our gut responses that operate from cellular wisdom. A society trapped in its mind and disconnected from its heart (where instincts are experienced as emotions) is already on its way to becoming mechanical and robotic. This may suit the control freak and wannabe dictator within us - but it&#039;s deleterious to our psycho-spiritual  well-being. Being desensitized to our    
instinctual responses is akin to filtering out 99% of sensory and extra sensory data and making &quot;logical&quot; decisions based on only 1%.
This explains how so many can be tricked into believing in and voting for a clone like George W. Bush, for example, who emanates almost zero empathy and is, therefore, only fractionally human. It&#039;s alarming when people are no longer able to detect energy fields - or have been trained to distrust extrasensory insights picked up by intuition. Otherwise they would automatically recoil from repugnant political entities spouting lifeless cliches and lying through every orifice. They never would have been fooled by the puppet show and 99% of the politicians currently in power would be selling insurance or involved in  MLM schemes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Objectivity&#8221; doesn&#8217;t really exist except as an excuse for not accepting full responsibility for one&#8217;s perceptions, opinions, and beliefs.<br />
For too many generations we have been left-brained biased &#8211; exalting rational thought above irrational feelings. But in nature, what we call&#8221;irrational feelings&#8221; are actually our instincts, our gut responses that operate from cellular wisdom. A society trapped in its mind and disconnected from its heart (where instincts are experienced as emotions) is already on its way to becoming mechanical and robotic. This may suit the control freak and wannabe dictator within us &#8211; but it&#8217;s deleterious to our psycho-spiritual  well-being. Being desensitized to our<br />
instinctual responses is akin to filtering out 99% of sensory and extra sensory data and making &#8220;logical&#8221; decisions based on only 1%.<br />
This explains how so many can be tricked into believing in and voting for a clone like George W. Bush, for example, who emanates almost zero empathy and is, therefore, only fractionally human. It&#8217;s alarming when people are no longer able to detect energy fields &#8211; or have been trained to distrust extrasensory insights picked up by intuition. Otherwise they would automatically recoil from repugnant political entities spouting lifeless cliches and lying through every orifice. They never would have been fooled by the puppet show and 99% of the politicians currently in power would be selling insurance or involved in  MLM schemes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Malaysian media dilemma? &#171; Mustafa K Anuar&#8217;s blog</title>
		<link>http://www.eyeonethics.org/2008/07/29/which-way-to-sway-a-dilemma-for-the-media-in-malaysia/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>The Malaysian media dilemma? &#171; Mustafa K Anuar&#8217;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eyeonethics.org/?p=98#comment-256</guid>
		<description>[...] For the entire analysis, check this out. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For the entire analysis, check this out. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
